Your browser (Internet Explorer 7 or lower) is out of date. It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites. Learn how to update your browser.


Pioneering oral historian who documented deaf experiences dies at 79


John S. Schuchman, the hearing son of deaf parents who was among the pioneers of oral history interviewing with deaf people, died of cancer Dec. 19, 2017. He was 79.

Schuchman, a longtime member of the Oral History Association and Oral History in the Mid-Atlantic Region (OHMAR), began his academic career as a history professor at Gallaudet University, which was established in Washington, D.C., in 1864 by an act of Congress as a national college for the deaf. He later became a dean, vice president of academic affairs and provost. He retired in 1998 but kept on teaching until 2000.

Shuchman’s first language was American Sign Language, and he used his ability to live in hearing and non-hearing worlds to advocate for an understanding of deaf culture. His historical research included an analysis of the movie industry’s treatment of deaf actors and its traditional use of hearing actors to depict deaf characters.

Schuchman’s research also focused on Nazi persecution of deaf people, among others with disabilities who were victims of the Holocaust. His work included interviews with deaf Hungarian Jews who survived Nazi death camps.

At Gallaudet, Schuchman introduced oral history to his deaf students and perfected the use of split-screen video recordings to capture oral history interviews conducted in sign language. He received OHMAR’s Pogue Award in 1990 for his lifetime contributions to oral history. The award is named for Forrest C. Pogue, who pioneered the use of oral history in World War II combat.

A native of Indianapolis, Schuchman earned degrees in history from Butler University and Indiana University and a law degree from Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.

He is survived by his wife, Betty Jane Engleman Schuchman of Ashburn, Virginia.

View All Spring 2018 Newsletter Articles.

Volunteer an hour to help transform understanding of metadata practices for oral history

By Jaycie Vos, OHA Publications Committee and Metadata Task Force

The Oral History Association Metadata Task Force is charged with improving access and discovery for oral history interviews by helping their creators and caretakers improve the capture and preservation of the interviews’ metadata.

The task force saw the need for more structured information to offer a base understanding of metadata: what it is and how people are using it. To this end, in 2016 we surveyed a select group of oral history programs at higher education institutions about practices, successes and pain points related to description.

After reviewing the results, we are launching Phase 2 of the survey, which aims to obtain information and feedback from a broader range of institutions and practitioners at higher education institutions, public libraries, cultural heritage organizations and anywhere oral histories are conducted and collected.

We want to hear from you! You can take the survey here. We anticipate this survey will take 45 – 60 minutes to complete. This survey may be completed by one person representing the practices of the whole; or, it may be used as an exercise among your overall staff or team, which we highly encourage, based on positive feedback received in our initial data-gathering phase.

Your submissions will be reviewed by the task force and will be incorporated into a larger report and menu of best practices, which we will then share with the larger community of oral history practitioners. Phase 2 of this survey will remain open through most of 2018, but we encourage you to complete it at your earliest convenience to enrich and expand the findings the task force can report out in forthcoming publications and presentations.

If you have any questions about the survey or our work in general, please feel free to email us at and we will be happy to communicate with you. Thank you!


The OHA Metadata Task Force

Doug Boyd, Lauren Kata, Natalie Milbrodt, Steven Sielaff and Jaycie Vos

View All Spring 2018 Newsletter Articles.

Co-Executive Directors’ Letter

By Louis M. Kyriakoudes and Kristine McCusker

The last few months have seen a whirlwind of activity as we have overseen the move of OHA’s former home at Georgia State University to its new home here at Middle Tennessee State University.

We’ve attended to many details, from setting up the new office here at MTSU’s Peck Hall, to registering the organization as a nonprofit with the state of Tennessee. We’ve learned new software programs to handle membership and the conference program, and we’ve transferred OHA’s operating accounts to a national bank with branches here in Murfreesboro.

We’ve welcomed Faith Bagley, a recent graduate from MTSU’s public history M.A. program, who is the new OHA program associate. We’ve also welcomed our student workers, Jordan Alexander, a student in MTSU’s public history Ph.D. program, who serves as our graduate assistant, and Bethany Bork, our undergraduate intern.

This smooth transition would not have been possible without the generous and cheerful help of OHA’s leadership and staff. First and foremost we want to thank Gayle Sanders Knight, outgoing program assistant, who has helped us at each point in the transition. She has answered our many questions with good cheer. She traveled to Murfreesboro to spend a week with us as we mastered the many ins and outs of OHA procedures.

Gayle’s steady hand at the Georgia State University executive office kept the association on track after Cliff Kuhn’s tragic passing. All who love OHA and the practice of oral history are in debt to her.

We want to thank the outgoing interim executive director, Kristine Navarro-McElhaney. She bequeathed to us all an organization in sound shape, and her training in accountancy has been a great help to us as we’ve established our office. Past president Doug Boyd and current president Todd Moye and the current members of Council have all been essential to this successful transition.

As co-executive directors, we have been struck by the dedication, skill, professionalism and sheer love for the association. We look forward to continuing in that tradition as we serve OHA and you, its members.

OHA social media efforts are in full swing. Please keep us apprised of your work, your projects, career milestones, grants and any other accomplishments and good news you want to share. Please send your announcements to

We look forward to seeing you all in Montreal!


View All Spring 2018 Newsletter Articles.

President’s Column

By Todd Moye

As you know, OHA is a little over one month into a major transition. Our executive offices have moved across the state line from Georgia State University to Middle Tennessee State University, where Kris McCusker and Louis Kyriakoudes have taken over as co-executive directors and Faith Bagley is our new program associate. Faith will be responsible for our conference logistics, among other things. They bring a unique set of oral history, public history, folklore and administrative skills to these jobs, and we are lucky to have them putting those skills to work for OHA.

I can’t imagine that the transition could have gone any more smoothly than it has so far. As a result, OHA leadership now has a little more breathing space and a little more time to look toward putting the finishing touches on some dishes that have been simmering for a while now. Here I’ll highlight two of them.

Our newest standing committee, Emerging Professionals, grew out of an idea that bubbled up organically from a few members a few years ago. Council liked their idea of a mentorship program that would pair emerging professionals with seasoned veterans at the annual meeting, thought it successful, and created a task force to manage the program.

At our last board meeting Council decided to transform the task force into a standing committee. Emerging Professionals will continue to manage the formal mentorship program along with other informal initiatives and will advise Council on policies and procedures to make membership in the OHA more valuable for oral historians at the beginning of their respective careers. Their work is obviously crucial to the long-term success of our organization.

From my perspective, this is a great example of how our task forces, committees and Council should work together. Members approached Council with a good idea, Council empowered them to put it in place, and when it proved successful Council institutionalized it.

The Diversity Committee is engaged in another major initiative, our Diversity Fellows program—another example of a good idea that percolated up from membership through a committee, rather than from Council down. This one, however, came with a large price tag, and it has been percolating at the idea stage for a while.

In a nutshell, this program will place a member of an underrepresented group who can demonstrate an interest in making a career in oral history in an institutional oral history program or archive for a few months–or perhaps year-long paid internship focused on the fellow’s professional development. OHA and the partner institution would split costs. Our hope is that once a final plan and funds are in place, the committee and Council can move quickly to select the inaugural fellow and partner institution and that we will be able to scale up the number of fellows soon thereafter.

The committee nearly plated the dish last year, but we do have a few more steps to go through before we can serve it. I have tasked the committee this year with identifying potential institutional partners and writing at least a rough draft of a budget and fund-raising plan that Council could begin to implement as early as this year, with a goal of selecting a fellow as early as 2019.

This is a tall order and achieving it will require hours of work from the committee members—and OHA members who aren’t members of the Diversity Committee. We will depend on all of you. If you have good ideas that would help us achieve what Council has long recognized as a goal, please get in touch with committee chair Zaheer Ali. If you have an idea about anything else oral history-related percolating in your own mind, let’s talk.

View All Spring 2018 Newsletter Articles.

OHA Conference Highlights

Keynote speaker unravels a history mystery for OHA audience

In the early decades of the 20th century, Greenwich Village was home to an odd character named Joe Gould, who coined the term “oral history,” founded an Oral History Association and walked around New York City claiming to write down everything anyone ever said to him, with the goal of documenting the lives of everyday people. He intended, he said, to write “The Oral History of Our Time,” which he claimed was the longest book ever written.

But when he died in a New York mental institution in 1957, no manuscript ever turned up. Later, in 1964, the New Yorker published an essay by Joseph Mitchell titled “Joe Gould’s Secret,” in which Mitchell claimed that the manuscript never existed outside Gould’s imagination.

Decades later, Harvard historian and New Yorker contributor Jill Lepore assigned a class to read Mitchell’s essay and was herself intrigued. She started digging. What she found, Lepore told an OHA audience, was far from what she expected.

For starters, the manuscript likely had existed, with Gould filling hundreds of notebooks with his stories about everyday people. But Lepore also found that “Gould really suffered from profound and ongoing mental illness.” He was arrested repeatedly, confined periodically to mental asylums and was obsessed with race and sex, aspects of his life that essayist Mitchell had omitted.

Lepore also uncovered Gould’s obsessive infatuation with Harlem Renaissance sculptor Augusta Savage, whom he stalked for decades after meeting her in Harlem in the 1920s. He claimed he asked her to marry him. Much of his writing about Savage was said to be obscene, and Savage convinced him to destroy it.

Gould is believed to have had a lobotomy in a New York State mental institution in the 1950s, and he never wrote or talked again, Lepore said.

Gould’s oral history association never amounted to much, but his early belief that oral history was a way to document the lives of everyday people–because they were part of history, too–animates much 21st century oral history practice, notwithstanding its dark past.


Contemporary activism illustrates importance of social media documentation, panelists say

The democratizing effects of social media have opened a new activist era and new forms of documentation reflected in Black Lives Matter and Standing Rock, a panel of human rights activists suggested at an OHA conference plenary session.

But social media at everyone’s fingertips also raise challenges for archivists who want to assure that saving social media content is accomplished ethically, some suggested.

Panelists included: Wesley Hogan, director of the Duke Center for Documentary Studies; Madonna Thunder Hawk and Beth Castle of the Warrior Women Project; Bergis Jules, an archivist at the University of California Riverside; Anh Pham of the Minneapolis-based RadAzns network; and Robyn Spencer, a history professor at the City University of New York.

Jules described Ferguson, Missouri, activists’ use of social media in documenting the violence that erupted in the St. Louis suburb after the 2014 shooting of an unarmed black teenager by a white police officer. There were discrepancies, Jules said, between accounts of the events on social media and those reported by mainstream media, giving archivists an opportunity to capture an unfiltered perspective of those involved. But doing so, he emphasized, requires an awareness of the potential for harm.

“I’m about radical inclusion into the archival record,” he said. But archivists need to think about what it might mean to preserve such material. The volume of it can be overwhelming, he noted. Moreover, law enforcement and national security agencies have made no secret of the fact that they mine social media for information.

Anh Pham, a Vietnamese-American immigrant anti-war activist, said her organization grew out of a Black Lives Matter support group that canvassed the Asian-American community in North Minneapolis and found that almost everyone said police treated them differently because of the color of their skin. That led to an effort to debunk the myth of Asians as “the model minority,” she said.

Indigenous rights activist Madonna Thunder Hawk recalled the Red Power Movement of the 1960s. “We didn’t have media of any kind,” she said. “We’re invisible.”

But last year, social media “brought the world to Standing Rock,” a Sioux Indian reservation in North Dakota where thousands of protestors gathered to fight construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline over concerns that a potential oil spill would threaten water resources.

Hogan, who chaired the panel, suggested that a broader issue related to archiving social media messages is how to decide what is the dominant narrative. She asked: “Whose knowledge counts?”


Pioneering oral historians recount lifetime of linking oral history and social justice

Alice Lynd was a nursery school teacher turned draft counselor in the 1960s when she realized that someone should write a book about the unknown men who were conscientious objectors refusing military service in Vietnam.  So she wrote it.

We Won’t Go, published in 1968, was based on oral history interviews, draft board records, letters and diaries of men called up for the draft. “I simply wanted the accounts to be in the individuals’ own words,” she told an OHA plenary session audience.

That was the first of a series of oral history-based books she and her husband, Staughton, wrote, with a focus always on social justice, whether related to draft resisters, steelworkers in Indiana and Ohio, West Bank Palestinians or death row inmates.

Alice Lynd said that in their work, she and her husband always look for corroborating information, contemporaneous accounts and primary sources. Having such background information is important, she said.

“The interviewer needs to know enough to ask critical questions” in an oral history interview, she said, later adding: “You need independent corroborating evidence.”

One audience member asked Staughton Lynd whether the nation should bring back the draft. Staughton noted that when the country had a conscripted army in the Vietnam era, there was considerable discontent within the military. “So people said we can fix that by making it volunteer.”

But even in the volunteer army and in society in general, there is a growing movement against today’s wars, he noted, citing a Carl Sandburg story about a little girl watching a military parade who says: “One day somebody will call a war and nobody will come.”

The Lynds, who are both lawyers as well as oral historians, authors and social activists, were awarded the 2017 Oral History Association’s Vox Populi Award, which recognizes lifetime achievement in using oral history to create a more humane, just world.

“We are very honored to be chosen,” Alice told the oral historians. “It’s not just us; it’s you. We need people who desire to carry it on.”


Historic flour mill site welcomes oral historians

What was once the world’s largest flour mill on Minneapolis’ riverfront was the site of the Oral History Association’s annual Presidential Reception, awards presentation and gathering for oral history newcomers and their volunteer mentors.

The Mill City Museum, which opened in 2003, was built in the fire-damaged ruins of the Washburn A Mill, part of a flour milling complex along the Mississippi River that gave Minneapolis the distinction of being the world’s largest flour milling center from 1880 to 1930.

The Washburn A Mill closed in 1965 and was later gutted by fire. But it became the foundation of the Mill City Museum, which documents the history of the industry that put Minneapolis on the map.

Although not all were able to be present, OHA 2017 award winners recognized at the reception included:

Article Award—Daniel R. Kerr for “Allan Nevins is Not My Grandfather: The Roots of Radical Oral History in the United States”

Book Award—Ma-Nee Chacaby and Mary Louisa Plummer for A Two-Spirit Journey: The Autobiography of a Lesbian Ojibwa-Cree Elder (University of Manitoba Press, 2016)

Elizabeth B. Mason Project Award (Major)—Alex Bishop and Tanya Finchum, Oklahoma State University, for Oklahoma 100 Year Life Oral History Project

Elizabeth B. Mason Project Award (Small)—Christian K. Anderson and Andrea L’Hommedieu, University of South Carolina, for University High School Oral History Project

Martha Ross Teaching Award—John Hutchinson, Marin Academy, San Rafael, California

Nonprint Format, Museum Exhibit—Calinda Lee, Atlanta History Center, for Gatheround: Stories of Atlanta

Nonprint Format, PodcastEric Marcus for Making Gay History

President’s Letter

By Todd Moye

The work of oral historians—listening to one another across the lines that too often divide us, thinking critically, developing empathy, building community—seems more important than ever, and I am honored to serve as OHA’s president at this particular time. I know that our recently concluded Minneapolis annual meeting, whose program was so packed with opportunities to learn from and enjoy one another, thanks to program co-chairs Rachel Seidman and Dan Kerr and to a supercharged local arrangements committee, energized me for the work of the coming year.

We are all fortunate to have a terrifically engaged Council working on our behalf. Unfortunately, earlier this year Claytee White had to resign her Council seat due to other pressing commitments. We are grateful for her service very sad to see her go, but were relieved when Troy Reeves agreed to step in and serve the remainder of her term. In recognition of the increased workload Council has taken on in the recent past, OHA members agreed to expand the Council by one seat at the business meeting in Minneapolis, so the 2018 election will have one more pair of nominees than you may be used to seeing.

Troy has also agreed to take on the duties of co-chair, along with Sarah Milligan, of the Principles and Best Practices Task Force. They have named a dozen colleagues who come to oral history from a variety of perspectives to the task force. Over the coming year they will revise the document that is in many ways the most important way that OHA interacts with current and future oral historians. I’ll have more to say about the work the task force is doing and about the important work of our standing committees—including our newest, New Professionals—in a future newsletter.

Speaking on behalf of Council, we know that you are likely a member of more than one organization like OHA. We all want it to be your primary organization—the most vibrant and diverse, the most responsive to your needs, the one that puts on the annual meeting you look forward to the most. I am more aware than ever that OHA thrives because our members volunteer for committees and task forces and share their ideas for how we as an organization can do better. So please, keep those commitments and ideas coming! We need them.

By the next time you hear from me the transition will be well under way to our new institutional home, Middle Tennessee State University, where our new co-directors Kris McCusker and Louis Kyriakoudes are already planning new initiatives to benefit our organization.

I will be forever grateful to Georgia State University and program associate Gayle Knight, and to Arizona State University and interim executive director Kristine Navarro. Without those institutions’ support I literally have no idea how we would have coped with Cliff Kuhn’s untimely passing, but they made it possible for us not merely to tread water but to move OHA forward during a very challenging time. Kristine and Gayle’s graceful, unflappable professionalism and good cheer set a standard that I will do my best to emulate. They have my undying gratitude.

Executive Director’s Report

Farewell but Not Good-bye
By Kristine Navarro-McElhaney
Interim Executive Director

It has been a tremendous honor and privilege for me to serve the OHA as Interim Executive Director during the past year and a half.  I am grateful to have been a part of the team effort that has strengthened OHA’s position going forward as the preeminent membership organization for people committed to the value of oral history. To be able to engage directly or indirectly with you at the very center of our work has been such a rewarding experience.  Thank you!

We have made great strides as an organization and as a force in public history, and there is no better time to be an oral historian, collaborate with oral historians or be associated with significant oral history initiatives. With leadership and direction from our president(s), the council, and committee volunteers, we have established our annual meetings as successful must-attend events with more than 500 members and colleagues in attendance.  We developed a strong statement on diversity and inclusivity that reaffirms our values as members.  With the support and assistance from council, members and Gayle Knight, our amazing program associate, we developed and implemented several policies, procedures and guidelines that will strengthen the core of the OHA.  We have created a framework for financial stability, committee structure and data gathering that will help guide our friends and new institutional team at Middle Tennessee State.   We drafted policies for the expenditure of discretionary funds, endowment investment, fiscal roles and responsibilities, council roles and responsibilities, a conflict of interest policy, and we hosted our very first webinar.

None of this would have been possible without a true team effort, and there is not enough space here to thank everyone who deserves it. But please know that your efforts and volunteer time have made a difference!

Finally, I want to thank the leadership at the School of Historical, Philosophical, and Religious Studies (SHPRS) at Arizona State University for recognizing the value of becoming interim institutional host for OHA during my tenure as Interim Executive Director.  Their support has been invaluable to me, to OHA and to our members.

Thank you again for all of the support, help and encouragement you have afforded to me personally and to our great team.  I’m excited about the future of OHA!

With gratitude,


New OHR editors

Three oral historians within a stone’s throw of each other—if you could throw a stone 100 miles—bring an array of disparate experiences to their new posts as editorial team members for the Oral History Review.

David Caruso of the Chemical Heritage Foundation in Philadelphia is the new OHR editor, Abigail Perkiss of Kean University in Union, New Jersey, is the new managing editor, and Janneken Smucker of Philadelphia’s West Chester University will take on the new position of digital editor.

The new editorial team, which will begin its duties in January 2018 replaces Editor Kathy Nasstrom and Managing Editor Troy Reeves, who developed the multi-editor leadership model for the OHR, enabling it to respond more nimbly to changes in academic publishing.

Caruso brings his experience as OHR Book Review editor and as director of the Center for Oral History at the Chemical Heritage Foundation. Perkiss, a history faculty member at Kean University, brings her experience as OHR pedagogy editor. Smucker, also a history faculty member at West Chester, assumes the new position of digital editor, bringing her background in developing innovative digital projects. The new position reinforces the OHR’s commitment to digital engagement with oral history content.

Independent scholar Nancy MacKay will be the new book review editor, and a search is still underway for a new pedagogy editor.

In their six years heading the OHR editorial team, Nasstrom and Reeves expanded the Review’s content, including addition of an annual pedagogy section and inclusion of online multimedia content. They created a social media presence for the Review, and in a unique first, they published a virtual issue to celebrate the Oral History Association’s 50th anniversary.

Members of the search committee for the new editorial team included: Susan McCormick, SUNY-Albany; Martha Norkunas, Middle Tennessee State University; Seth Kotch, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and Nasstrom, who served as an adviser.

First OHA webinar attracts world-wide audience


An international audience of more than 200 people interested in oral history registered for the Oral History Association’s first webinar “Documenting Your Community: Planning Skills for Oral History Projects.”

The Nov. 3 online workshop was presented by Mary Larson of Oklahoma State University and Jeff Corrigan of California State University Monterey Bay.

Corrigan said more than 85 people watched and participated in the live webinar, and a total of 234 registered to either watch live or get a link to the presentation for later use.

Participants represented a wide array of individuals from local historical societies, libraries, museums and state and federal government agencies, including historians, students, teachers, genealogists and independent scholars, he said. Most participants were from the United States, but people also registered for the workshop from Canada, Australia, Germany and Turkey.

The webinar focused on community oral history basics, including how communities can assess available resources, determine the scope and planned outcome of oral history projects, to choose interviewers and interviewees and figure out what additional resources and expertise community projects might require.

People who participated are being asked for their feedback to help OHA leaders determine whether future webinars are warranted.

Endowment gifts allow international outreach

Endowment earnings over the years have enabled 28 international oral history scholars to attend OHA annual meetings in the past five years, enriching experiences for everyone.

In 2017, the International Committee awarded $4,000 in scholarships to four international oral historians to come to Minneapolis. Here are their thoughts about their experiences:


Lorna Barton, Scotland

The funding I received from the Oral History Association was integral to my ability to present my paper in October 2017 at the annual conference, and I cannot thank the International Committee enough for selecting me.  I would not have been able to attend it without it.  The funding allowed me to not only connect and network with a small number of academics in the field of queer oral history research at the conference, of which I am a part of, but with the wider oral history community via coffee breaks, workshops and the “Speed Networking” event, which I attended during the conference.

I found there were elements of my research that could relate directly to other oral historians’ work despite our stark differences in focus, such as oral histories with military personnel, of which a large number of the trans narrators in my cohort were members under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”  I found this to be an extremely beneficial opportunity, because I not only needed to verbalize my research quickly and articulately, but it allowed me to share my ideas for the dissemination of my data, receiving feedback from more seasoned oral historians and mentors. Additionally, the opportunity to network during these events or breaks has given me possible future collaborative opportunities, which I would not otherwise have gained without funding from the International Committee.

Moreover, the funding allowed me to glean knowledge and invaluable feedback from presenting alongside other queer oral historians, and my paper was very well received.  I also attended two panels that were LGBT focused and thoroughly enjoyed hearing what other queer historians were undertaking and reflecting on their research with regards to my own. Few crucial occasions such as these come around to interact with my community and my peers, and I feel it benefited me extraordinarily.  It has given me a new-found passion for my research.

Again, I cannot thank the International Committee enough for granting me this funding as I benefited intellectually from hearing other oral historians’ papers and arguments that were U.S. specific in panels such as “Oral History on the Margins” and “Organizing with Oral History in the Trump Era” and in many ways related politically to the arguments within my own thesis.  As an early career researcher, it made me realize that I have knowledge worth sharing.

Sophia  Isajiw, Canada

Thank you for awarding me an international scholarship that allowed me to attend OHA’s 2017 Annual Meeting and present my research project on the oral histories of the diaspora children of Ukrainian Holodomor famine genocide survivors in the roundtable session: “Intergenerational Consequences of the Holodomor in Ukraine (1932-33 Famine): What Oral History Accounts from Ukraine and the Diaspora Tell Us.”

It was an honor to present at the OHA with my esteemed colleagues from across Canada and the U.S., who represented different aspects of this genocide research, to a group of interested oral historians who listened well and asked excellent questions that precipitated a very interesting comparison in our research during the discussion that would not have come up otherwise.

A major benefit for me and for all of us was being able to bring information about the Holodomor to a broader audience of oral history researchers and scholars to increase awareness of this little known and long suppressed history of genocide and to our current oral history research being done in this area in the hopes it will spark some further research or collaborations in the future.

It was also, significantly, the first time we were able to come together and speak with each other about our research as a group and compare information in public, which turned out to be a very valuable experience.

I very much enjoyed being part of the conference and participating in other sessions. It was beneficial to participate in the work of other oral historians in workshops and to network with others in the field and share information. It was also striking to note that oral historians who have been practitioners for some time are such warm, curious and interested scholars who absorb information deeply, listen well and of course ask good questions not raised by other audiences on this rare topic. Thanks for that.

Hong Jiang, China

As a first-time attendee, I was greatly impressed by the diversity of Oral History Association’s membership and a wide range of activities offered at the annual meeting. Besides getting constructive feedback on my current oral history project, I have also learned practical skills, gained inspiration and expanded my network. Attending workshops informed me of various cutting edge technologies, such as OHMS, which would largely benefit oral historians’ daily practice.

The lifework of the Lynds motivated me to continue with oral history as an academic pursuit. Personally, the highlight of this year’s OHA meeting was the presidential reception at the Mill City Museum. This event not only featured the excellence in the field, it also demonstrated OHA’s invaluable support for newcomers to the profession. The well-designed museum itself was a stimulating eye-opener for me. It encouraged me to explore more creative ways to utilize oral history and engage audiences, making a city’s or a nation’s rich history accessible to the world.

I would like to take this opportunity to extend my great gratitude to the International Committee for their generous support. Receiving the scholarship enabled me to embark on this fruitful journey in the first place. Many thanks to Professor James Karmel for his consideration and instructive comments. I also want to thank Gayle Knight for her kind assistance prior to and during the conference. Having gained so much from this incredible experience, I strive to return the favor and contribute to the growth of OHA by sharing my experience and introducing the organization to my fellow oral historians in China.

Riikka Taavetti, Finland

In this year’s OHA Annual Meeting, as a first time attendee, I was fascinated by the strong emphasis in the presentations on the diverse aspects of civil rights movements. These perspectives on activism truly showed how oral history can open the breadth of the movements and their meanings for people’s everyday lives. Moreover, the keynote by Jill Lepore, was incredibly educating and opened multilayered perspectives to the past of oral history.

As this was not only my first OHA Annual Meeting but also my first academic conference in the U.S., it was extremely interesting to experience what the debates in the field look like from American perspective. For instance, working myself partly on post-Soviet topics, the perspectives on post-socialism discussed in one of the panels were very inspiring.

Despite the fascinating panels and Lepore’s excellent keynote, the most important aspect of the Annual Meeting was, after all, the welcoming atmosphere. I was also glad to hear that many are planning to attend IOHA Finland conference held in Jyväskylä next June. I hope we can be as welcoming hosts for all new and old friends from OHA.